Extended Lab Days #4 – Lotte Anker and Le Quan Ninh

May 30, 2017 All, Journal, Lab Days, New, Uncategorized

For our last Lab Days before summer we invited Lotte Anker and Le Quan Ninh to join the eight instrument strong Revoid Ensemble. Lotte is a marvelous saxophone player and composer that I have been admiring at a distance for some time, and in connection to this project I have been listening a lot to her album “What River Is This”. Percussionist Le Quan Ninh was brought in on the suggestion of our cello/voice artist Audrey Chen. As preparation for our days together with him I’ve been listening to his wonderful playing and also reading from his interesting and inspiring text “Improvising Freely: the ABCs of an Experience”.

Central to our research at this point is developing a kind of modular approach in which different pre-conceived materials (“modules”) are seen as “playgrounds” that can attract the attention of the players and bring out a specific sound in the ensemble, or perhaps serve as injectors changing the direction of an improvisation. Any player can engage in any module at any time and the other players reacting by joining or counter playing is optional. Below is Klas’ score that we used for this occasion:

unnamed

The titled circles represent the different modules and have different materials, in musical notation and/or written instruction, connected to them. Some have suggestions pertaining to instrumentation, for others there are different alternative ways of arriving at a specific sound. In the middle we see a set of terms to investigate. To the left are concepts relating to experienced musical qualities (“resistance/affordance”, “ambiguity”, “morphability” and “permeability”), and to the right are practical suggestions that could enhance those qualities and that has to do with how we “approach”, “transition”, combine”, “organize”, “vary” and “relate” materials and/or instruments.

My experience when working with this score is that the modules substantially contributes to the piece without coming in the way of  the airiness and openness of the improvisation. There are no sharp boundaries as to what is pre-conceived and what is inspired by the moment. I think it has to do with the combination of concrete materials and open and suggestive instructions, as well as the clear intention of not arriving at specific “versions” to be revisited, but rather to continue improvising with everything from small detail to big form. I felt it worked really well for organizing even a huge ten-piece improvising orchestra like ours, favoring focus and playfulness at the same time. Great fun!

Ricard Österstam